Two tracks, one standard
Pick the one that matches your work. The scoring grid is shared; its wording adapts to your discipline.
4 finalist places
Technological Innovations track
Startups, AI platforms, tele-counselling and connected medical devices serving Primary Health Care.
I am an innovator2 finalist places
Scientific Research track
Young researchers producing evidence — epidemiological, clinical, operational — to guide mental health policy.
I am a researcherOfficial scoring grid
Six criteria, applied the same way to both tracks.
| Criterion | Innovations track | Research track |
|---|---|---|
| Disruptivity / Rigor | Originality of the solution, relevant use of technology and AI | Methodological rigor, protocol, data validity |
| Mental health impact | Improves access to primary health care, reduces inequalities | Value of the evidence for public policy |
| Viability / Applicability | Business model, scalability, deployment potential | Potential to translate results into clinical practice |
| Team and expertise | Complementary profiles, execution capability | Institutional anchoring, academic rigor |
| Pitch quality | Storytelling clarity, concision, quality of the Q&A | Ability to popularize complex scientific data |
| Ethics and sustainability | Data protection, compliance, social impact | Bioethics committee compliance, integrity |